We’re old enough to remember when stocks would sometimes trade down when the market was open.  These days not so much.  For both the S&P 500 (SPY) and Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) tracking ETFs, there hasn’t been a single day since March 25th that either one closed the day lower than it opened.  That’s an incredible streak of 13 straight trading days, and for both ETFs – which have been in existence for more than 20 years – it’s a record.

In the case of SPY, there have only been five other periods in the ETF’s history (all after 2005) where SPY was positive from the open to close for ten or more trading days.  The prior record for consecutive open to close gains was 12 trading days back in January 2013, and the most recent was in February 2015 (ten trading days).

For QQQ, streaks of ten or more trading days of open to close gains have been a bit more common with eight prior streaks (again all after 2005).  Prior to the current streak, there were two other streaks of 12 trading days (July 2009 and February 2017), but the most recent streak of 10 or more days was back in early December 2020.

Given the positive correlation between the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, you would think that, like the current streak, many of the prior streaks overlapped with each other.  However,  the only two periods besides the current one where there was any overlap between the two streaks was back in October 2006 and February 2015.  If you remember the year that followed February 2015, unless you’re underweight equities, you’re probably not hoping for a repeat of that period.  Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options for our best research available.

In today’s Morning Lineup, we detailed some of the findings of the NFIB survey of small business optimism released this morning including the record high in businesses reporting jobs are hard to fill and how the survey results are usually tied to politics.  In addition to optimism indices, the NFIB also surveys small businesses on what they consider to be their single most important problems. Considering a record number of responding firms reported that jobs are hard to fill, on a combined basis, 31% reported either the cost or quality of labor as their most pressing issue.  While the reading for the quality of labor was unchanged at 24%, fewer firms reported the cost of labor as their biggest issue. Only 7% reported labor costs as their biggest problem in March compared to 9% the prior month. The percentage of firms reporting either cost or quality of labor as their biggest concern continues to sit off the respective peaks, but that is still at historically high levels.

The other area that has dominated businesses’ main problems concern taxes and government requirements.  Following the election, the percentage of businesses reporting either of these issues as their biggest problem spiked to 35% in December. In the time since then, that move has reversed down to 31% in March with the readings for both taxes and government requirements falling one percentage point.  At that level, the combined reading is the lowest since right before the election in October.

With both government and labor-related problems less on the mind of small businesses recently, it begs the question of what has replaced them. The more clear part of that answer is inflation.  4% of businesses reported inflation as their biggest issue which is consistent with the index for higher prices reaching its highest level since 2008.  That compares to the previous month when only 2% of businesses reported inflation as their biggest concern.  As for the larger and less clear change, 10% of businesses reported “other” as their biggest problem, up 4 percentage points from the previous month. The ‘other’ category is poorly defined as to what it encompasses, but it could be a range of factors.  Based on events in the month of March, we can speculate that they could include supply chain issues given the blockage of the Suez Canal and the semiconductor shortage.  Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options for our best research available.

Bespoke co-founder Paul Hickey appeared on CNBC’s Closing Bell on Monday (4/13) to discuss markets heading into earnings season.  To view either of the segments click on the links or image below.  Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options for our best research available.

Closing Bell: Intel’s Plans to Invest in American Chip Fabs

Closing Bell: Earnings Season

One of the hottest areas of the market heading into this week was the Transports as the Dow Transportation Index was riding a streak of ten straight positive weeks- its longest weekly winning streak since 1989.  The index is down so far this week, so unless it can turn things around, the weekly streak will end just one shy of the 11-week record in 1989. This week’s decline aside, if you are a follower of Dow Theory, the strength in the Transports is positive.

The snapshot below is a custom portfolio of the members of the Dow Transports from our Trend Analyzer and is sorted by YTD performance.  Topping the list are shares of Avis Budget (CAR) which has more than doubled YTD.  Like CAR, most of the index’s biggest winners have also been beneficiaries from the re-opening trade as American Airlines (AAL), JetBlue Airways (JBLU), Alaska Air (ALK), and Southwest Airlines (LUV) round out the top five.  While re-opening stocks focused on transporting people have seen the biggest gains YTD, companies focused on the transportation of goods have lagged.  At the bottom of the list, shares of CH Robinson (CHRW(, United Parcel Service (UPS), Union Pacific (UNP), and CSX are all up less than 10% YTD.

As mentioned above, the recent strength in the Transports has been led by ‘people’ rather than ‘parcel’ transporters, but it’s interesting to see how leadership has shifted over time.  We broke out the Dow Transports based on those that transport people (CAR, ALK, LUV, UAL, DAL, AAL, and JBLU) versus those that transport stuff (all the others) and then calculated the relative strength between the two baskets.  In the chart below, a rising line indicates outperformance on the part of ‘people-movers’ versus ‘parcel-movers’ and vice versa.  In the early days of the pandemic even before the lockdowns started and the WHO declared a pandemic, the ‘people-movers’ cratered on both an absolute and relative basis.  They continued to drop after, and it wasn’t until mid-May that they finally bottomed on a relative basis.  The period from late May through early June was strong for the ‘people-movers’, but as the summer wave accelerated, they quickly ran out of steam.  From there, there was little in the way of outperformance from either group.

In early November, the ‘people-movers’ got a boost from the Pfizer (PFE) announcement regarding preliminary results of its COVID vaccine, but throughout the winter there was still little leadership among either group.  It wasn’t until February of this year when vaccine rollouts picked up steam and fatigue from a winter of remaining stuck at home, that Americans finally really started to start going out again providing a huge boost for the ‘people-movers’.  More recently, even as Americans are more optimistic than ever about moving around heading into the Summer, the ‘people-mover’ stocks have stalled out relative to the ‘parcel movers’ which continue to rally. Whether this is just a period of consolidation following a big rally or something else remains to be seen, but it’s noteworthy that even as passenger air traffic continues to pick up and more airlines recall staff, the transports most leveraged to travel are at the same level they were at in late February. Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options for our best research available.

Last week, we repeatedly noted how there has been rotation back into growth-oriented sectors like Technology and Consumer Discretionary.  For example, mega-cap names like Tesla (TSLA), Apple (AAPL), and Amazon (AMZN) have been some of the top performers in the second quarter whereas they were some of the worst performers in Q1.  As a result of the strong performance of these names which all have heavy weights in the S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW), the ETF has undergone some notable price action over the past couple of weeks.  At the start of April, IVW finally broke back above its 50-DMA after repeatedly failing to do so throughout March.  Last week, that rally continued as the ETF also broke out above its February highs.

That sort of strong technical picture is not true for all growth stocks though. Instead, it is more of a market cap story.  The Russell 2,000 Growth ETF (IWO) has been stuck in a downtrend over the past few months with another failed attempt to change that last week.  Whereas IVW is extremely overbought (at least two standard deviations above its 50-DMA) as of Friday’s close, IWO is trading below its 50-DMA.

In the chart below we show small-cap growth relative to large-cap growth through the ratio of IWO to IVW.  Throughout the fall and winter, small-cap growth had been outpacing its large-cap peers as the ratio shot higher.  But in mid-February, the ratio peaked and in the past month, it has more sharply pulled back as a rotation into large-cap growth has taken place.  In fact, the ratio has fallen over 10% in the past month!  As shown in the second chart below, there have not been many times since the two ETFs began trading in 2000 in which the ratio has fallen as sharply in such a span of time.  The most recent instance was one year ago during and in the immediate aftermath of the bear market. Before that, it was almost a decade since the next most recent occurrence.

With just five prior occurrences, there is not a particularly large sample size for these types of moves, but returns have tended to be strong following past times that the ratio of IWO to IVW has fallen by at least 10 percentage points in a single month. For both ETFs, returns have been stronger than their relative norms over the following weeks and months. Small-cap growth has perhaps performed slightly better on average although that is due to smaller declines following the late 2000 instance. In other words, big outperformance of large-cap growth in the past has been generally good for growth stocks. Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options for our best research available.