During the Cold War, American children and adults were educated on how to best protect themselves from a nuclear explosion. This included measures from the silly “duck and cover” campaign to nuclear fallout shelter instructions. If you happen to be curious about the federal government’s current recommendations in regards to protection from a nuclear blast, you can read up on the instructions here. We’re not sure how focused people will be about wearing a mask in the event of nuclear fallout, but we guess you can never be too careful!

With tensions between Western nations and Russia reaching levels not seen since the Cold War, we took a look at Google Trends to identify the level of fear in the American population with respect to the current war in Ukraine. We looked at the search volumes for terms like nuclear war, WWIII, canned food, Potassium Iodide, and gas mask. Searches for many of these terms hit five-year highs in the early days of the Russian invasion but have subsided since. The current level is still well above normalcy, but fears appear to have eased over the last week as the West’s retaliation has been almost entirely economic (or maybe there is no internet service in the fallout shelters). The aggregate index is pictured below.

Below are charts of each search term we utilized in the composition of our index. Potassium Iodide, the compound utilized to mitigate the effects of excessive radiation exposure, is the only term that remains at a five-year high in terms of search volume. While searches for some of these terms were actually much higher during the early days of COVID, they all experienced upticks in the last few weeks.  All-in-all, based on search trends based on fears of a nuclear situation or war with Russia spiked when the Ukraine invasion first started, but those fears have over the course of the last week. Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options.

Considering equities and other risk asset prices continue to swing violently, so too have readings on investor sentiment.  The weekly AAII survey of individual investors saw the percentage of respondents reporting as bullish fall back below 25% this week after rising above 30% last week. While that is not the largest drop in recent months (the second week of January saw bullish sentiment fall 7.9 percentage points compared to 6.4 today), it nonetheless reaffirmed that investor confidence is shaky, if not undecided, at the moment.

The drop in bullish sentiment was mostly picked up by those reporting as bearish. Bearish sentiment rose 4.4 percentage points to 45.8%. While that reading is roughly 15 percentage points above the historical average for bearish sentiment, the reading is still lower than an even more pessimistic reading only two weeks ago when more than half of respondents reported as bearish.

With the inverse moves in bullish and bearish sentiment, the bull-bear spread has pulled back to -21.8.  As with bullish and bearish sentiment, even if that does not set a new low, it is only in the 5th percentile of readings going back to the start of the survey.

After the largest single-week decline in nearly 20 years two weeks ago, neutral sentiment has been clawing its way back into the range it was in for most of the past year.  Gaining another 2 percentage points this week, the reading is now back above 30%.

Across each category of the report, there have been sizable swings in the past two months. To highlight this, in the chart below we show the eight-week rolling average of the absolute week over week change for each sentiment reading (bullish, bearish, and neutral) over the past 20 years.  Over the history of the survey, weekly changes have gravitated towards smaller swings meaning the past decade is structurally a bit different relative to the decade before that. That being said, the weekly swings in the AAII readings on sentiment have been some of the largest of any period of the post-Global Financial Criss era. In fact, not even the COVID crash saw such volatility in sentiment (given optimism collapsed and then remained muted for some time rather than swing back and forth) while the only times this average was as high as now in the past decade were the spring of 2013, February 2016, and January 2019. Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options.

While today’s CPI data did not come in hotter than expected as feared (matching expectations of 7.9% YoY growth), jobless claims came in worse than expected for both initial and continuing claims.  Seasonally adjusted initial claims rose to 227K versus expectations of a 2K increase from last week’s unrevised level of 215K.  In addition to the higher reading this week, the last print was also revised up by 1K.  In spite of the lack of improvement in claims recently (it’s been over 3 months since the multi-decade low of 188K set in early December), the level of claims remains historically low.

On a non-seasonally adjusted basis, claims for the current week of the year are in line with readings from the few years prior to the beginning of the pandemic.  In terms of the seasonal pattern, the current week of the year typically has not seen claims rise week over week as they did this year.  Claims tend to fall at this point of the year with the few weeks surrounding the current period marking some of the weeks of the year with the most consistent declines in claims. Regardless of the somewhat seasonally unusual move, the broader seasonal pattern this year has not marked a major divergence versus history.

Continuing claims were expected to fall from 1.476 million down to 1.450 million. Instead, claims rose by 18K.  As with initial claims, even though that is not as strong a reading as anticipated. It is far from leaving claims at any sort of worrisome level.Click here to view Bespoke’s premium membership options.